Review #4: Look Alive Twenty-Five, by Janet Evanovich

Oh, Janet. Did you write this one? It feels like maybe you didn't.

First, a summary. One of Vinnie's bondees (is that a word?) has gone FTA and forfeited his collateral, The Red River Deli in Trenton, which means that Vinnie is now the proud owner. The only problem? Three managers have gone missing in the last month, so Vinnie taps Stephanie and Lula to run the show. As bad as Stephanie is as a bond enforcement agent, she's even worse as a deli manager. On the other hand, Lula is surprisingly pretty good at it, even if the health department needs to look the other way every time she's in the kitchen. Morelli's on the case of the missing managers, and Ranger's on the scene because one of his men (Hal) winds up missing, too.

It all sounds vintage Stephanie Plum, but there was something different about this book that I couldn't quite put my finger on. There were no car explosions, no mention of Big Blue, no truly wacky shenanigans, no meals with Morelli at Pino's, no Simon Diggery, no Tank (again), very little of Connie, even less of Grandma Mazur, no funerals, and no Mrs. Plum ironing. There's a brief appearance by Valerie, Albert Kloughn, and their weird kids (the eldest hasn't outgrown the horse thing yet), who haven't been seen in at least ten books. I thought for sure when Lula posited the alien theory that Mooner would show up, but he hasn't been seen in awhile, either. Bizarrely, Wuulf made an appearance, which I found strange after Diesel showed up in book 24, but his storyline was never really fleshed out, kind of like Diesel's last appearance. Vinnie is around more - he shows up naked except for one shoe. There is very little in the area of actual bounty hunting, and one of the two FTAs Stephanie recovers is a dead body that seems to leave her pretty unimpressed. The other involves a poorly written catnapping scene that would have been more funny had there not been exploding roadkill in the last book.

And I have to say that the Ranger/Stephanie/Morelli thing bothered me this time around. Normally, I'm all for letting the girl have a little fun as long as all parties are okay with it. But this time, it felt different. After the comfortable domesticity of last book where Stephanie practically moved in with Morelli because Diesel was in town, and pointedly did NOT stay with Ranger, Janet did a complete 180. Morelli tells Stephanie that he and Ranger have worked it out that one of them is with her at all times, which means when Joe is called to a crime scene, Ranger swoops in to babysit her. And if Ranger gets caught up somewhere, he physically hands her off to Morelli, or, in most cases, sends one of his men to watch her. Like, Stephanie has a 24 hour bodyguard in the form of a Rangeman guy (and yet Wuulf still manages to poof in and out of her apartment without anyone seeing him). At one point, Morelli actually turns to Ranger and tells him that he needs to take her home with him, because Morelli's going to be awhile. Stephanie says something to the effect of, "You trust Ranger?", and Joe says, "No, but I trust you". Which I guess is growth? Maybe it shows that Morelli is comfortable with their relationship? But it's RANGER. I mean, COME ON. Nothing happens, because Stephanie talks herself out of it, but Ranger certainly doesn't make it easy. And Ranger used to be pretty circumspect about the whole thing; he let Stephanie know the offer was on the table, but he was never really aggressive about it and never really propositioned her. Last book he basically said the ball was in Stephanie's court and that he wasn't going to do anything. This time? He's actually asking, which is a big departure from his usual MO. It's almost like Ranger is getting ready to make a move to make a commitment to Stephanie. And Joe seems totally disinterested. At times it almost read like Ranger and Morelli have a gentleman's agreement when it comes to her, which, if that's what everyone wants, then okay, but nobody's, you know, talked to Stephanie about this. 

I don't know. I'll still read these as along as she churns them out, but I'll come here to bitch about it.

Review #3: Hard Core Twenty-Four, by Janet Evanovich

Simon Diggery is FTA, so Stephanie goes to get him, and he happily goes along with her. Simon's usually an issue, so when he's willing to go to jail and hang out there for a while, Stephanie can't resist asking why. Turns out, there are zombies on the loose, which Simon discovered while grave robbing. Which, okay, but Stephanie's not interested in zombie hunting because it's scary, and besides, she's too busy taking care of Ethel, Simon's pet boa, while Simon is in the clink. 

But then Morelli catches a case involving a body with a missing brain, and then Grandma offers up the information that brains and heads have gone missing from the funeral home, and then Diesel shows back up, and, well, Stephanie needs to maybe deal with the zombie thing.

In the meantime, Grandma has met a George Hamilton lookalike online, and he invites Grandma down to visit him in Key West. So she runs away, Connie finds out that George looks more like the Costanza version than the Hamilton version, he's married, and he and his wife are swingers. So in the midst of zombie hunting, Stephanie has to go rescue Grandma and bring her back while Mrs. Plum eyes her ironing board. Also, Diesel is crashing at Stephanie's, Stephanie is staying at Morelli's, and Rex is having a sleepover at Ranger's. It's good to be Rex.

It's typical Stephanie Plum - wacky highjincks and lots of food (I don't understand why Stephanie doesn't weigh 500 pounds) and crazy outfits from Lula and some car explosions. And speaking of, for the first time ever, Ranger threatens to exact payment for a new car: a night with him. Stephanie knows she is going to blow up this car. Ranger knows she is going to blow up this car. EVERYONE knows she is going to blow up this car. So she double or nothings him, and sure enough, she blows up the second one. (Well, one of them didn't explode, but some road kill exploded inside, so...same thing.) Anyway, Ranger, in a throwaway line but one that I found very interesting, tells Stephanie, in response to her query about whether he's going to collect on their bet, that she is driving this bus, and she alone makes those decisions. It's made very clear that Stephanie is going to have to make the move. 

Which brings up a whole other discussion, and one that we've had before, about whether it's time for Stephanie to grow up and make a choice. And for awhile, I thought she was moving in that direction; she and Joe were sort of engaged to be engaged during the last book. But with this Ranger bet, I'm not so sure. And I wonder if Janet's trying to tell us something with Diesel back in the mix, although Stephanie pointedly stays at Joe's while Diesel is there. I vacillate over how to feel about Stephanie and her inability to make a decision, and whether Joe is a sucker for staying with her, and whether Stephanie is a jerk for treating Joe the way she does, and whether Ranger is just a player. But then I realize that maybe I'm giving too much though to fictional characters and their romantic lives. Plus also: Team Ranger 4-eva, so I have to kind of suspend my moral outrage in order to keep reading about him.

Conspicuously missing from this installment were Stephanie's dad, her cousin Eddie Gazarra, Vinnie, Grandma Bella, and Joyce Barnhart. And Tank, whom I love dearly. And even though Valerie and Albert Kloughn and their pack of weird kids haven't been around in several years, I miss them, too. Connie and Lula weren't as prominent and even though the men were around, they were definitely not the focus. Stephanie did a lot on her own this time around, which is a bit of a departure, and it was kind of nice to see. 

I'll keep reading these as long as Janet churns them out. I mean: Ranger. Duh.

Review #2: The Trials of the Honorable F. Darcy, by Sara Angelini

It has admittedly been a long time since I read Pride & Prejudice. My memories of that book have probably been conflated with the several retreads that have come out in the last twenty years, most notably Bridget Jones. And maybe I need a reread in order to compare Austen to Angelini. Or maybe P&P just isn't that great (blasphemy!)? But it feels like I'd remember if Original Recipe Darcy was this much of a prick.

Judge Fitzwilliam Darcy is a British barrister with an expertise in international law, who also happens to be the youngest judge in San Francisco. Elizabeth Bennet is a young attorney who appears before him on a regular basis. Elizabeth's sister Jane falls in love with Darcy's best pal Bingley, who is the brother of Darcy's friend-with-benefits, Caroline (which itself feels kind of out of the realm of believability), which allows Elizabeth and Darcy to bump in to each other in a variety of awkward situations. There's conflict, some barbs thrown, and some misunderstandings, along with a token Gay Best Friend Lou, a bachelor auction where Elizabeth bids $50,000 for Darcy, only to be outbid by Caroline, and a British estate called, naturally, Pemberley.

Okay, fine. We have all the players, up to and including Mrs. Bennet, who is desperate for her daughters to marry. And who also gets stoned for Christmas dinner.

Except not fine at all. Darcy is a prick. Like a Grade A, Genuine Jerk. I get that he's supposed to be kind of crabby and curmudgeonly. But this is not what this Darcy is. The version is like a milquetoast iteration of Christian freaking Grey, complete with a scene involving a riding crop. He is a demanding, petulant, spoiled little brat who goes to Elizabeth's boss and tells him - after he and Elizabeth have broken up and she has said in no uncertain terms that she wants to foster her career instead of their relationship - that they are having an affair. Which they are not, since they, you know, mutually decided to end it. Which leads to her boss freaking out and immediately sending her to another city because this could jeopardize the sale of his firm and his retirement (dude, this isn't Suits). It essentially upends her entire life, forcing her to move or else risk her reputation. It never occurs to anyone that Darcy should consider stepping down; the courts are too overwhelmed and they are short a judge and it "wouldn't be fair". Darcy has about eleventy billion more options - a different court district, stepping down from the bench to practice law, the aforementioned Pemberley estate - than Elizabeth, who is just starting out in her career. But it's Elizabeth whom Darcy expects to completely change her life.

If that wasn't enough, the plot holes are big enough to drive a semi through. I'm not sure how the whole lawyer/bar thing works, but my guess is that you can't be a British barrister, come over to San Francisco on a lark, and suddenly become a judge in California. Don't you have to, you know, pass the bar over here? American laws and British laws are similar, but even I know that you can't practice law in Alabama if you only passed the bar in Alaska. It's also never made clear what kind of law Elizabeth is practicing here, nor what kind of judge Darcy is, only that the "courts are backed up" and there are only a few judges in the city/county/town/wherever they are. And Elizabeth tries several cases a day in front of Darcy, yet has time to meet with clients, and apparently her office is in the courthouse, even though she's clearly in private practice. And it only takes a few hours to fly from California to London. Direct.

And then we come to the sex scenes. They...are not sexy. Your mileage my vary, but the use of the word "titties" when having your characters engage in sexy times talk would not be my first choice. And then there is this scene, after a brief interlude between Darcy and Elizabeth during Jane and Bingley's wedding reception, where Elizabeth uses a trick that Gay Best Friend Lou taught her. (In person, by the way. With real life props. Ew.)

"It seems I have misjudged you, Mr. Hurst. I owe you an apology," Darcy said to him, staring straight ahead. Lou said nothing. "And a car," Darcy continued. He saw the corners of Lou's mouth curl up in a reluctant smile. "And possibly a retirement plan of some sort," Darcy continued.Lou laughed. "She wouldn't take all of my advice," Lou replied and took a sip of his drink."There was nothing lacking in her performance, I assure you," Darcy replied and took a sip of his own drink. Their eyes met in the mirror.Lou replied, "Yes but it would be vastly improved by the removal of her front teeth."

EW EW EW EW EW.

(Also, that's a direct quote. The writing is... well, that's a direct quote.)

Maybe I'm getting to be old-fashioned in my old age, or maybe I'm just a prude, but this scene squicked me out. It comes almost at the end of the novel, just before the magical wedding and the obligatory epilogue where Darcy has been brought to his knees by his love for his newborn daughter. And I think the reason that this scene bothered me so much is that it's just so indicative of the whole attitude of the story. Darcy calls the the shots. Darcy doesn't have to give up his career. Darcy's career - and reputation - are never on the line. Darcy doesn't have to move. Darcy doesn't even have to reciprocate in that aforementioned scene. Darcy gets the girl, keeps his job, keeps his reputation, keeps his money, and is even cheered and lauded by his colleagues when they see him kissing Elizabeth. I wonder how that would have played if the roles had been reversed.

Hard. Pass.

Review #1: The Taliban Shuffle: Strange Days in Afghanistan and Pakistan, by Kim Barker

A couple of years ago, a movie came and went starring Tina Fey called Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, the military call letters for WTF. I didn't even remember the movie until I went looking for reviews for The Taliban Shuffle after I'd read it. I sometimes like to read reviews after I've finished a book, just to see if my thinking is in line with the critics'. One thing I discovered while doing so this time, apart from the fact that the book was made in to a movie, was that the reviews are as mixed as the characters in Kim Barker's memoir.

Barker is a wet-behind-the-ears reporter when she lands in Afghanistan to write stories about people nobody back home much cares about, in the middle of a war our country has largely forgotten. She's as green as green can be; at times she reminds me of Cheryl Strayed, sitting on the side of the mountain on the Appalachian Trail with no shoes. But she's hungry, and she wants to do her job, and she wants to report. And so she sets off, this intrepid young reporter, to discover something to write about.

Aided by her driver, a man who served as a translator, a bodyguard, a sherpa, a cultural instructor, and, sweetly, a friend, she traipses through Afghanistan and Pakistan in a post 9/11 world, trying to explain to those of us back home what's happening and why we should care. It's a time when the soldiers have been there long enough that they are bored, and the reporters are even more bored, so they find themselves creating a little enclave of orphans, much like what I imagine the ex-pats in Paris and Madrid in the 1920s to have been like, only instead of wine and cheese and the running of the bulls with Hemingway, it's Chinese brothels and too much alcohol and the danger of being a woman - uncovered and unaccompanied - in a country where females are not seen as equal.

The negative reviews focused on Barker's selfishness and navel-gazing - Huffington Post used the word narcissism - and that is somewhat true. But I also think that Barker had a rough go of it, some of her own making and some just because war is, as the saying goes, hell, and this book and her attitude is her way of dealing with it. Thinking about it now, and having happened upon a couple of episodes of M*A*S*H recently, she's not unlike Hawkeye Pierce. That is to say, good at her job, funny, self-deprecating, and very, very aware of the shitty nature of the world.

Although Hawkeye was never propositioned by the former Pakistani prime minister. So there's that.